Future Retail, 7-Eleven terminate franchise agreement after payment default

Future Retail, 7-Eleven terminate franchise agreement after payment default


Financially troubled, and Texas-based convenience store chain, have today decided to mutually terminate their franchise agreement after the Kishore Biyani company failed to meet the target of opening stores and payment of franchise fees.

In a statement to the stock exchanges, said no financial or business impact on the company is expected as the arrangement was at the subsidiary company level.

In February, 2019, both had signed the franchise agreements for developing and operating branded stores within India. Future group was planning to set up convenience stores all over India to sell soft drinks to grocery items.

The Future group already owns Nilgiris branded stores but 7-Eleven is known for its 24-hour accessibility format and offering extras to its customers. 7-Eleven has close to 71,000 in 70 countries as of July last year.

The 7-Eleven project failed to take off as Future group financial condition started deteriorating due to rising debt both at the holding level and at the operating level since mid-2019.

In March 2020, the Corona pandemic further impacted sales and profitability of For the fiscal 2021, Future Retail’s sales fell 62 per cent to Rs 6,261 crore while it made a loss of Rs 3,180 crore. The group had to seek a one time debt restructuring to avoid a collapse.

In August last year, the Future Group decided to merge all the group’s listed companies into Future Enterprises and then sell the underlying businesses and debt to for a total consideration of Rs 24,700 crore. The transaction is currently on hold due to a litigation with American retail giant, which had bought 49 per cent stake in a holding company of Future Retail Ltd. . As on June 30, 2021, Future Coupons held 9.82 per cent stake in Future Retail, according to BSE. Overall, promoter group held 19.86 per cent in Future Retail.

says it had signed a non-compete agreement with Future group and has the right of first refusal over Future’s stake in the holding company and hence its transaction with RIL is invalid. The matter is currently pending in the Supreme Court which has asked both parties to wait for the final order of Singapore arbitration court.

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *