Faceless assessment: Fresh SOPs issued to address taxpayers’ conflicts

[ad_1]



The faceless authority has suggested a host of changes in the assessment process following conflicts and practical difficulties raised by since the new regime was introduced.

On August 3, the National Faceless Assessment Centre issued a set of standard operating procedures (SOPs) to address several anomalies in the regime.

The faceless centre, constituted by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, is the nodal authority and works as an interface for the faceless regime.

Under the new SOP, an assessing officer will propose computation of income and loss after considering all aspects — differences and variations in the tax addition made by the department and responses submitted by the assesse — before passing the final order in the case.

The assessing officer will prepare an income and loss determination proposal (ILDP) after considering the taxpayers’ reply to a show-cause notice and a personal hearing in each case, it said.

The SOP states that ILDP should be fair and judicious. The assessing officer must submit it for risk analysis within a reasonable time. The initial tax notice under the faceless assessment will be more comprehensive and specific now, according to the SOP. It will be structured better after considering all internal data available to the assessment official.

The faceless unit has also suggested specific timelines for each step of the process.

The faceless authority has even defined roles of the assessment unit, verification unit, technical unit and review unit in the revised SOP, which was absent earlier.

Defining the role of each unit will ensure a smoother process and could lower litigation on procedural grounds.

Further, to improve compliance, the department will send a centralised communication to in case of non-responsiveness of the notices. It also suggested sending a physical letter at the latest known address along with text messages of the assessee.

The authority also suggested key conditions for verifying the assessment case. It should be done in case of non-availability of digital footprint of “third person” (other than assessee). The assessing officer can seek verification if it requires — cross verification of evidence, examination of books, recording of statement, examining of witness, etc.

Besides, the assessing officer can seek special audit in a specific case such as nature and complexity of accounts, volume of accounts, doubts about transactions, and specialised nature of business activity.

The authority also suggests that the final assessment order must contain specific information such as if the assessee seeks video conferencing without filing complete or any submission against show cause, inference made on the basis of which tax variations are being made, among others.

As the faceless scheme is evolving, it will require continuous rework to make it viable for . The purpose of the scheme was to eliminate corruption and not to cause inconvenience to taxpayers, it noted.

KEY RECOMMENDATIONS

  • According to the new SOPs, assessing officer will propose computation of income and loss after considering all aspects before passing the final order in the case
  • The officer will prepare an income and loss determination proposal after considering the taxpayers’ reply to a show-cause notice and a personal hearing in each case
  • Faceless unit suggests specific timelines for each step of the process
  • The department will send a centralised communication to taxpayers in case of non-responsiveness of the notices

Dear Reader,

Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.

We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor



[ad_2]

Source link